Home The News
 
HIV Innocence Project
English Afrikaans Arabic French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish Swahili

Main Menu

Latest Comments

Latest Posts

Low-dose naltrexone

by CarolinaP
on Thursday, 24.February 2011 20:45

can anyone recommen a lawyer

by loadsofhair
on Monday, 03.May 2010 17:34

misdianosis of hiv....

by loadsofhair
on Monday, 03.May 2010 17:31

Ignorance is bliss

by Biden38
on Tuesday, 19.January 2010 06:29

Dishonest doctoring

by MikeHersee
on Wednesday, 16.December 2009 23:29

The News

We Poisoned Our Own HIV+ Baby

postdateiconTuesday, 30 April 2013 09:10 | postdateiconLast Updated on Tuesday, 30 April 2013 22:44 | postauthoriconWritten by Our Staff writer | PDF | Print | E-mail
Mother-of-two Kiersty Caesar-Taylor now believes that she and her husband, Donovan Taylor, unjustiably poisoned their young baby with medical treatments prescribed by their HIV consultant. Kiersty and Donovan, who were diagnosed HIV+ when their baby, named Rainbow Taylor, was 11 weeks old, at first followed medical recommendations to give the anti-retroviral drugs (ARVs) prescribed by their medical consultant. At first Kiersty stopped breastfeeding and she also started Rainbow on ARVs prescribed by their consultant to reduce the possibility of Rainbow being infected in case she had not been infected with HIV already, but then they were told from a viral load test that she already had HIV. Kiersty was allowed to resume breastfeeding but was told to continue with the prescribed treatment for Rainbow, for a likely 2 year period as a minimum
Kiersty says, "We Were told that the purpose was to keep the viral load down to prevent HIV from harming Rainbow's immune system. As a responsible mother I asked about possible side-effects, especially as the doctor said she'd have to be on the drugs for (at least) the next couple of years of life, but I was assured that allowing HIV to run wild would be much more serious than the minimal risk of serious long-term side-effects. Naturally, concerned about our daughter's well-being we diligently gave her the treatment they prescribed".
But almost immediately problems became apparent. Rainbow, who up to then had been thriving and growing normally, immediately began vomiting up after having the medication, requiring Kiersty and Donovan to top up the medication as directed. She also quickly became more listless and sleepy, was more unsettled and cried a lot more as if she was in pain.
Kiersty also noticed that the mild eczema Rainbow already had massively flared up and her face was covered with a substantial rash. "The doctor told me that was nothing to do with the ARVs", says Kiersty. More worryingly, despite intensive efforts to ensure adequate feeding, her bowel movements became substantially abnormal with severe constipation and her rate of growth seemed to be slowing down dramatically, which was particularly noticeable on her arms and legs and also her face. "I was becoming increasingly concerned that the medication, which we were giving her to save her life, was actually causing serious harm. The prospect of long-term treatment with these or similar drugs really frightened me".
The couple intensified their research efforts to find out more about the meaning of their HIV diagnoses and of the relative risks and benefits of treatment. "One of the medics had warned us not to check the internet because there was all sorts of rubbish there about HIV, and it might be overwhelming and alarming", said Kiersty, "But what we were finding was some very authoritative sources that raised serious concerns in our minds. What was really worrying me also was that when I asked some probing questions at the clinic, I was told I was a natural worrier and my concerns were pretty much brushed aside. Instead I was told Rainbow was doing very well because her viral load had gone down. Yet all I could see was my baby becoming sicker and looking and feeling lifeless ".
The concern about the lack of Rainbow's growth since starting the ARVs and it's consistency with the evidence they had uncovered, and the disparity with what they were being told by the doctor led the couple to do an experiment: Having been warned by others it could be dangerous to withdraw any strong medication suddenly they gradually withdrew the ARVs from Rainbow without telling doctors to see how she fared, as by then they were concerned about how the doctor would react to such a proposition. Once the treatment was stopped it didn't take long for Rainbow to perk up. The rash on her face quickly receded and her growth returned to normal and even the Drs unknowingly had said "it's the best I've ever seen her". "Her behaviour returned to normal as well and she didn't seem to be crying in pain in the way she had before. It was absolutely clear to us that the drugs had been doing her serious harm and causing her real distress", said Kiersty.
"While she was on the treatment there were so many things that were different I couldn't focus on all of them because I was paying close attention to some major ones, but looking back there were some other serious signs as well. I know babies wiggle their limbs about in a sort of uncontrolled manner, but there was something about the movements on her left side that she did 5-10 times a day. Since she's come off the medication those have stopped. In retrospect it looks as though she was having some kind of convulsion", Kiersty said. "If there hadn't been so many other things concerning us at the time, that alone would have made us wonder what the hell was going on inside her".
Doctors had wanted the couple to try Rainbow on Abacavir as an eventual alternative to the AZT, "...but when we gave her that she projectile vomited. We gave up on that very quickly. Yet when I told the doctor, he brushed it off as her simply 'not liking the taste'. At that point I really wondered if he expected us to believe that, or if he just wasn't right in the head", she said.
She added, "Another thing that caused me concern - I couldn't help noticing that nearly everyone at the clinic was black. Intuitively that didn't seem right to me somehow given the disproportionate representation. I’ve since found out the reason why that might be, and I’m going to investigate that further”.
But aside from medics’ extraordinary interpretations of own child’s symptoms, the evidence of her own eyes seemed to confirm the evidence they had seen about serious long-term harm from AIDS treatment given to children. “At the clinic, all these children who were being 'saved' from HIV by the drugs seem to have all sorts of developmental problems. Even the nurse admitted this was quite common, which supported the evidence we had found - yet the doctor seemed to sidestep my concerns about such risks. The clincher though was finding out about a similar case to ours where the child also suffered considerable pain and lack of growth while on ARVs, yet when she was taken off them she eventually recovered from the side effects, grew up healthily and after a couple of decades has now had her first child".
Kiersty noted that doctors seem to be absolutely obsessed with viral load at the expense of clinical health and well-being. "It is really striking that in our case, at the beginning when Rainbow's viral load was high, she was healthy and growing, and doctors thought she was dangerously ill. When she started on the treatment her viral load plummetted like a stone and doctors said she was doing really well, yet her health suffered terribly and her growth stopped and she even became thinner. But when we took her off the drugs and he health and growth both recovered dramatically, doctors have now become very concerned because her viral load has gone up. Rainbow's actual health seemed to be opposite to the viral load numbers. There's something not right going on here, that they seem to be more concerned that the numbers look right than her actual physical health"
Kiersty added, "And they seem to be trying to keep parents in similar situations from getting together as a group. It's as if they want each set of parents to feel isolated. They didn't put us in touch with any others despite repeatedly asking. It's as if they want each set of parents to feel isolated.
She finished, “Ultimately we're very angry that we were misled into unwittingly poisoning our own baby daughter with our own hands. We think more people should be made aware of what we've discovered about the drugs being prescribed".

Mother-of-two Kiersty Caesar-Taylor now believes that she and her husband, Donovan Taylor, unjustifably poisoned their young baby with medical treatments prescribed by their HIV consultant. Kiersty and Donovan, who were diagnosed HIV+ when their baby, named Rainbow Taylor, was 11 weeks old, at first followed medical recommendations to give the anti-retroviral drugs (ARVs) prescribed by their medical consultant. At first Kiersty stopped breastfeeding and she also started Rainbow on ARVs prescribed by their consultant to reduce the possibility of Rainbow being infected in case she had not been infected with HIV already, but then they were told from a viral load test that she already had HIV. Kiersty was allowed to resume breastfeeding but was told to continue with the prescribed treatment for Rainbow, for at least a 2 year period as a minimum.

Read more...

Positively False 2nd at Marbella film festival

postdateiconMonday, 15 October 2012 19:29 | postdateiconLast Updated on Monday, 15 October 2012 20:16 | postauthoriconWritten by Mike Hersee | PDF | Print | E-mail

positive false marbella 'Positively False', the movie by Joan Shenton and Andi Reiss documenting the efforts of truth activists to fight against a scientific hegemony, has won second place at the Marbella Film Festival. Joan Shenton reported that many people expressed astonishment that they had not previously heard of the issue the film raises and also were horrified by the them.

 

The film can be viewed at http://positivelyfalsemovie.com/index.html

House of Numbers showing in North London

postdateiconSunday, 24 April 2011 09:42 | postdateiconLast Updated on Sunday, 24 April 2011 10:44 | postauthoriconWritten by Mike Hersee | PDF | Print | E-mail

Cine Matters at the Community arts centre Passing Clouds in Dalston, North London, will be screening House of Numbers on Sunday 1st May 2011. Passing Clouds is a thriving and busy community centre, located here. The exact address is 1, Richmond Road, London E8 4AA, just off Kingsland Road, behind The Haggerston pub. If you find this, you're not far away. There's also a bar inside the community centre though so you may prefer to imbibe in the slightly more hippy environment of Passing Couds itself.

The nearest stations are Haggerston (330m) Dalston Kingsland or Dalston Junction, and buses are 38, 55, 67, 149, 242, 243. Note: Not all those stations are visible on Streetmap.co.uk, but they can be seen on the overground section of the london tubemap, available here.

The screening will start promptly at 7pm and afterwards there will be a discussion panel.

Comments (3)

Special Showing of House of Numbers in London

postdateiconSunday, 27 February 2011 11:11 | postdateiconLast Updated on Sunday, 27 February 2011 12:26 | postauthoriconWritten by Mike Hersee | PDF | Print | E-mail

red-house-of-numbers-posterThere will be a special free showing of the multi-award-winning documentary House of Numbers on Sunday 13th March at 11am. The Cinema is The Shortwave Cinema in Bermondsey at 10 Bermondsey Square, London SE1 3UN.

House of Numbers examines many of the traditional beliefs about HIV/AIDS people take for granted by interviewing many of the worlds top AIDS experts, including Robert Gallo, Luc Montagnier, David Baltimore Robin Weiss, Anthony Fauci, James Curran, James Chin, Donald Francis, and other leading figures in the AIDS orthodoxy, as well as gay men who were heavily involved in gay culture and activism at the time that AIDS hit the public consciousness such as Martin Delaney and the now-late Hank Wilson who died recently. Director Brent Leung also questions several key figures who challenge orthodox perspectives such as Peter Duesberg and Nobel Laureate Kary Mulli. To uncover the facts director Brent Leung visits many desitnations round the world including AIDS hotspots such as South Africa.

House of Numbers has won multiple awards at film festivals including three 'best of festival' and several 'best documentary' awards, including the 'Golden Ace' winner at the Las Vegas film festival. At several film festivals there have been attempts to disrupt screenings. At the Raindance film festival in London in 2009 the organisers received enormous opposition in a bid to prevent the film being screened, prompting Xavier Rashid, one of the programmers and organisers, to say they'd received,

"...A dozen legal letters and threats, and warnings from scientists and HIV victims and solicitors in New York, all trying to make us pull out the film from the festival. Because of all this criticism that it was supposedly denialist we've had to go through it in 15 second intervals...to try and figure out if the criticism had any grounding, and we really did not find anything to corroborate all the criticism we've received... My personal opinion is that it's a fantastic film"  (to hear the full quote click here)

This screening is being organised for a documentary to mark journalist and documentary maker Joan shenton's 20 years of documenting controversy about AIDS. Her company, Meditel, was the first independent TV company to win Documentary of the Year in the UK. After the screening there will be a discussion and a chance to ask questions of a panel including Mike Hersee who runs HEAL London and Dr Christian Fiala, a Viennese Ob/Gyn who has worked extensively in Africa and especially in one of the supposedly most AIDS-hit countries in Africa, Uganda. He was also on former South African president Thabo Mbeki's AIDS panel. There will also be a chance to talk to Joan Shenton and to voice your opinion for the vox-pops.

The Shortwave Cinema, just off tower bridge road, is roughly equidistant from Borough, London Bridge and Bermondsey stations. To book your free place, please send an email to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 

Nadja Benaissa - Criminal or Victim?

postdateiconFriday, 27 August 2010 12:36 | postdateiconLast Updated on Thursday, 02 December 2010 23:14 | postauthoriconWritten by Mike Hersee | PDF | Print | E-mail

Nadja Benaissa convicted of passing on HIVGerman popstar Nadja Benaissa has been found guilty of recklessly infecting her boyfriend with HIV by having unprotected sex with him after she’d been diagnosed HIV positive. But there are a number of clues that raise serious questions about whether she could technically have committed the crime at all.

Read more...
More Articles...
feed-image

Copyright © 2011. All Rights Reserved.